[Tagging] start_date variants

Anton Klim tohaklim at gmail.com
Sat Feb 16 11:10:06 UTC 2019


I think those would mostly be historical uses. Considering it’s part of an abandoned proposal, don’t think there would be much new entries. 
Plus, buildyear implies you can specify a year, instead of a date, like you can for start_date and its possible offshoots. 

Ant

> 16 февр. 2019 г., в 10:22, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> написал(а):
> 
> Actually building:buildyear is of much more widespread use than building:start_date:
> 
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=building%3Abuildyear -> 2051 objects
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=building%3Astart_date -> 163 objects
> that's a 12.6:1 proportion...
> 
> The key is documented in the IndoorOSM proposal [1] and in a wiki page of which I fail to understand the meaning [2].
> 
> Sergio
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/IndoorOSM
> 
> [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q2952
> 
> 
>> On 2019-02-16 10:39, Anton Klim wrote:
>> I believe there was an (failed? Undocumented?) attempt to make building:buildyear a thing, but haven’t seen it used for a while. 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190216/95d1d6ba/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list