[Tagging] start_date variants

[Stephan Bösch-Plepelits]

On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:53:52PM +0100, Sergio Manzi wrote:
> Then I guess the correct solution would be to not "stick" the amenity to the building but to a new relation whose only member will be the building itself.
> 
Yeah, that was the other solution I thought of.

In the particular case which I was describing in the opening mail
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1937535
the building is already a multipolygon relation.

Do you think a relation with a multipolygon relation as member would work?
Or would it be better to duplicate the multipolygon relation?

Logically I would prefer the first solution, but I have doubts on the
technical support.

greetings,
	Stephan
-- 
Seid unbequem, seid Sand, nicht Öl im Getriebe der Welt! - Günther Eich
,----------------------------------------------------------------------.
| Stephan Bösch-Plepelits  ❤ code ❤ urbanism ❤ free software ❤ cycling |
| Projects:                                                            |
| > OpenStreetMap: openstreetbrowser.org > openstreetmap.at            |
| > Urbanism: Radlobby Wien                                            |
| Contact:                                                             |
| > Mail: skunk at xover.mud.at > Blog: plepe.at > Code: github.com/plepe |
| > Twitter: twitter.com/plepe > Jabber: skunk at jabber.at               |
| > Mastodon: @plepe at en.osm.town                                       |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'