[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 15. Feb 2019, at 13:20, Tobias Wrede <list at tobias-wrede.de> wrote:
> 
> By German law you are required to use footpaths if they exists on the road. In these examples there are no footpaths on the roads so you should be able to use the carriageways.


this is oversimplified, you are indeed legally required to walk on the road even in the presence of sidewalks: if carrying big loads. When there is no signage, foot=no is incorrect and will not represent the situation on the ground. 

If nobody should ever walk in that underpass, authorities should put a sign to prevent them, come on, it’s Germany,  in Italy they do it:
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.9072106,12.5050822,0a,75y,340.46h,91.26t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1sdU0xMXx0zp9JjpMHB24tOQ!2e0

Nobody sane would anyway walk into a traffic tunnel without pedestrian spaces, regardless of the instructions your navigation device issues ;-)

Ciao, Martin 






-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190217/825e873d/attachment.html>