[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Mark Wagner]

Tracks are often "access=private" for everyone, so there's no reason to
call out foot access in particular.

-- 
Mark

On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 19:27:44 +0000
Dave F via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> Why do you exclude tracks?
> Legal access to them are often denied as they're on private land 
> (example: farms)
> 
> Why ford?
> Why oneway?
> 
> Cheers
> DaveF
> 
> On 15/02/2019 11:50, Tobias Wrede wrote:
> > As far as I am concerned roads that are most likely to merit a
> > foot=no are
> >
> > - all highway road types except tracks and except where foot=no is 
> > regionally implied
> >
> > - where there is no sidewalk
> >
> > any that have one of:
> > - bridge=yes
> > - tunnel=yes
> > - ford=yes
> > - oneway=yes
> > - bicycle=no/private/...
> > - bicycle_road=yes (?) Not sure if there are countries where a 
> > bicycle_road would forbit foot traffic in absence of sidewalks
> >
> > you could also exclude highways that are part of a hiking route
> > (might be difficult with relations and might overdo it).
> >
> > lit=* is to fuzzy in my opinion to be useful.
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging