[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Dave F]

On 18/02/2019 08:33, Peter Elderson wrote:
> Different tagging will not remove the non-consensus. 

What consensus will it remove? Misunderstanding the meaning of a tag is 
not consensual. Different tags allows the specifying of varying 
objects/attributes

> Non-conflation is unrealistic.

That conflation occurs doesn't make it acceptable. Your 
misunderstanding/misuse of the 'sidewalk' tag is resolved with another tag.
> (wow, 5 negs in a row, respect!)
>
> Mvg Peter Elderson
>
> Op 18 feb. 2019 om 01:45 heeft Dave F via Tagging 
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>> het 
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> True. Primarily because there's a false conflation of meanings, such 
>> as yours. That there are laws in certain countries around the world 
>> is irrelevant. *Within* OSM that tag has no legality implied. A 
>> different tag would be required to map what you suggest.
>>
>> Cheers
>> DaveF.
>>
>> On 18/02/2019 00:30, Peter Elderson wrote:
>>> I'm afraid countries differ with respect to legal imlications of 
>>> sidewalk.
>>> This discussion, I've seen it 5 times now ande it never ends with 
>>> consensus. It never ends at all.
>>>
>>> Vr gr Peter Elderson
>>>
>>>
>>> Op ma 18 feb. 2019 om 00:49 schreef Dave F via Tagging 
>>> <tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging at openstreetmap.org>>:
>>>
>>>     As already stated, sidewalk is to indicate a physical object.
>>>     Sidewalk
>>>     has no legal implications. 'Foot' is used purely to indicate
>>>     legality.
>>>
>>>     On 17/02/2019 22:29, Tobias Wrede wrote:
>>>     > Am 17.02.2019 um 20:44 schrieb Andy Townsend:
>>>     >> I don't think that a "global" encouragement to add foot=no makes
>>>     >> sense; there'll be lots of countries where it'd be silly.
>>>     >>
>>>     > I don't think the app "encourages" anything. In this quest the
>>>     app
>>>     > merely speculates that the sidewalk=none could maybe warrant a
>>>     foot=no
>>>     > and asks the user if that is the case.
>>>     >
>>>     > As others and I have pointed out this speculation is not so
>>>     > ill-founded for some situations (e. g. bridges, tunnels) but
>>>     overdoes
>>>     > it for the standard roads out there.
>>>     >
>>>     > Tobias W
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > _______________________________________________
>>>     > Tagging mailing list
>>>     > Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>>     > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Tagging mailing list
>>>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190218/542a7a0c/attachment.html>