[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Dave F]

As stated previously the sidewalk tag has no legal implication. The 
question within the app needs amending to clarify that's it's the 
legality of walking along the road that's being queried, not the ease or 
dangerousness.

Cheers
DaveF

On 18/02/2019 12:05, Tobias Wrede wrote:
> Am 18.02.2019 um 00:48 schrieb Dave F via Tagging:
>> As already stated, sidewalk is to indicate a physical object. 
>> Sidewalk has no legal implications. 'Foot' is used purely to indicate 
>> legality.
>
> So? I don't think this is disputed.
>
> The reasoning here is that the absence of a sidewalk in some 
> situations goes along with a foot=no signage. Think of a 
> motorized-traffic only overpass. So now if StreetComplete finds a 
> situation with sidewalk=no and no foot=* tagged it merely asks if that 
> is a situation where the original mapper forgot to put the access=no 
> on the road or not.
>
> Tobias
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging