[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

[djakk djakk]

... for the unclassified / residential issue : highway_level=5 or 6 and
highway_physics=countryside or town


djakk


Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 15:25, djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hello !
>
> I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its
> administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least 5
> levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large lanes,
> link=yes ...), possibly its traffic characteristics.
>
> So we can tag a secondary motorway or a primary road through a residential
> area or an official motorway with pedestrians actually walking on it.
>
> So that we’ll unify osm road classification through the world (remember
> the highway=trunk issue ;-))
>
>
> Julien “djakk”
>
>
>
> Le sam. 23 févr. 2019 à 16:49, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>>
>> On 23/02/2019 15:35, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> > ... But we don't have
>> >    primary_residential
>> >    primary_not_residential
>> >
>> > even though in the US that makes just as much sense as
>> > level5_residential and level5_not_residential.
>>
>> OSM sort-of did have that a very long time ago.  The "abutters" key was
>> used for something like that (see
>> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/abutters ) but even when I
>> started (in 2008) I don't remember being told to use that key.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190224/d5203438/attachment.html>