[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

[djakk djakk]

Hello ! So I have written something on the wiki :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Djakk/new_tagging_scheme_for_roads

It is not definitive, feel free to add new ideas or to criticize ;)

Julien “djakk”


Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 11:36, djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com> a écrit :

> I meant “road for hgv” not “road for hybrid” ^^
>
> Julien “djakk”
>
>
> Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 11:35, djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> I forgot to mention that there are several kind of road to class :
>> footway, cycleway, road for cars, road for hybrid, road for psv ;)
>>
>> Julien “djakk”
>>
>>
>> Le lun. 25 févr. 2019 à 10:55, Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9035 at gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> Service roads would be highway=service as it is now.
>>>
>>> road_level tag also solves non-primary motorway tagging (motorroad,
>>> autovia, non-expressway freeway, Polish S-road, Russian limited access
>>> A-road etc.). You would tag a non-primary motorway as highway=motorway
>>> road_level=<nonzero>.
>>>
>>> 25.02.2019 00:20 tarihinde Graeme Fitzpatrick yazdı:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, 25 Feb 2019 at 00:27, djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com
>>> > <mailto:djakk.djakk at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     Hello !
>>> >
>>> >     I think we should decorrelate the attributes of a road : its
>>> >     administrative class, its importance in the road network (at least
>>> >     5 levels), its physical characteristics (motorway-like, two large
>>> >     lanes, link=yes ...), possibly its traffic characteristics.
>>> >
>>> >     So we can tag a secondary motorway or a primary road through a
>>> >     residential area or an official motorway with pedestrians actually
>>> >     walking on it.
>>> >
>>> >     So that we’ll unify osm road classification through the world
>>> >     (remember the highway=trunk issue ;-))
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I could see that working!
>>> >
>>> > Replace the existing highway= types (=motorway; =primary etc) with
>>> > highway=1 to =5?, with 1 being the existing =motorway, down to 5 being
>>> > all the minor streets in a town.
>>> >
>>> > If you have a look
>>> > at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/-28.0643/153.4191 (& I'm
>>> > pretty sure everywhere around the World will look fairly similar?),
>>> > the pink Pacific Motorway (=motorway) would become =1; the orange /
>>> > tan major arterial roads (=primary: 2; 3; 7; 40; 50) =2; yellow
>>> > connecting roads (=secondary) =3; white roads through suburbs
>>> > (=tertiary) =4; all the grey minor roads (=residential /
>>> > unclassified): residential in the suburbs, commercial areas in the
>>> > CBD, roads inside industrial areas etc =5.
>>> >
>>> > Would you need =6 for service roads (driveways, parking lanes etc), or
>>> > would they stay as the current=service designation?
>>> >
>>> > Setting levels like this & rendering them this way, would also get rid
>>> > of the problem of roads not being visible in remote areas because a
>>> > "secondary" road won't render - even if it's only hard-packed dirt, it
>>> > would still be the level 1 or 2 road in this area!
>>> >
>>> > Feasible?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > Graeme
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190225/7f9b42bc/attachment.html>