[Tagging] Tagging of amenity=kindergarten operated by charitable operators and organisations

[Marc Gemis]

While I was first thinking of brand like Warin, I think this is the
better solution. Just as, we do not map the share holders of companies
(even when they are other companies) on shops, man_made=works object
etc., we typically do not map properties of the operator (besides
brand).

m.

On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 9:22 AM Topographe Fou <letopographefou at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Personnaly I don't think I would map umbrella organisations... I would put operator and operator:wikidata and let Wikidata update partnerships between associations. It is not a property of the kindergarten, it is a property of the operator.
>
> LeTopographeFou
>
>   Message original
> De: t.pfeifer at computer.org
> Envoyé: 7 janvier 2019 11:14 PM
> À: tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Répondre à: tagging at openstreetmap.org
> Objet: Re: [Tagging] Tagging of amenity=kindergarten operated by charitable operators and organisations
>
> On 07.01.2019 19:08, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> >     if it is a religion related operator, I usually also add religion and denomination tags, i.e. in
> >     your Caritas example it would be
> >     religion=christian
> >     denomination=catholic
> >
> >
> > I would not be sure how to handle this:
> > Are these "access" tags, in the sense that (in the example) the kindergarten only accepts Roman
> > Catholic children, or is it only indicating the religious background of the institution, but they
> > accept children with other religious backgrounds as well.
>
> I have never considered the 'religion' tag as an access tag. Typically I can freely enter a PoW, and
> listen to the ceremony, without being a member of that community or believe in that religion.
>
> Similarly, educational institutions in my scope mostly accept children with different background, in
> particular if the receive state funding. E.g. Ireland, the majority of the schools is operated by
> the catholic church, and as a recipient of public funding they have to accept everybody, equally.
>
> Back to Konrad's question, any better ideas to tag the name of the operator's umbrella organisation?
> I drafted:
> > operator:umbrella=* would be more suitable, or more self-explanatory but longer
> > operator:umbrella_organisation=*
>
> tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging