[Tagging] Trailhead tagging

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Jan 10 16:46:25 UTC 2019


wikipedia tag should be on trailhead solely in case where Wikipedia article is about this specific trailhead

AFAIK there is no existing tag to cover linking to Wikipedia pages describing type of feature, and
at least I see no use for it (but feel free to invent new one - though sooner or later someone would use it
to link "Tree" article from every single natural=tree)

Maybe tagging operator (and operator:wikipedia) will be enough?

Jan 10, 2019, 5:06 PM by pelderson at gmail.com:

> No it’s not. Please rethink your analogy.
>
> Mvg Peter Elderson
>
>> Op 10 jan. 2019 om 13:34 heeft Marc Gemis <>> marc.gemis at gmail.com <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>>> > het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> On the wiki page for the Wikipedia tag [1]
>>
>> "only provide links to articles which are 'about the feature'. A link
>> from St Paul's Cathedral in London to an article about St Paul's
>> Cathedral on Wikipedia is fine. A link from a bus depot to the company
>> that operates it is not (see section below)."
>>
>> what you do is similar to the bus depot example of what not to do.
>> Perhaps you could use "Secondary Wikipedia links" (see [1]) to resolve
>> your problem.
>>
>>
>> The discussion of the Starbucks usage was a.o. in the thread of [2]
>>
>> [1] >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia>
>> [2] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-January/075432.html <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2016-January/075432.html>
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:14 AM Peter Elderson <>>> pelderson at gmail.com <mailto:pelderson at gmail.com>>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Where can I find that discussion / decision?
>>>
>>> Op do 10 jan. 2019 om 10:16 schreef Marc Gemis <>>> marc.gemis at gmail.com <mailto:marc.gemis at gmail.com>>>> >:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 4:20 PM Peter Elderson <>>>> pelderson at gmail.com <mailto:pelderson at gmail.com>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The wikipedia page is not a list, it is a description of what a TOP is in Nederland. A wiki page about trailhead tagging is not the right place for that. I think this is within the scope of the wikipedia key.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Just as it was discouraged (aka "please remove the tags") to tag every
>>>> Starbucks cafe with the Wikipedia link of Starbucks, I think the
>>>> linking an individual TOP point to the general description of TOP
>>>> should be discouraged.
>>>>
>>>> m.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Vr gr Peter Elderson
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tagging mailing list
>>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190110/6a8cc517/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list