[Tagging] The actual use of the level tag

Jarek PiĆ³rkowski jarek at piorkowski.ca
Sun Jan 20 22:47:48 UTC 2019


On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 at 16:58, Tobias Zwick <osm at westnordost.de> wrote:
> Well, all of which I mentioned is optional. But I can come up with two
> use cases for wanting to know which level is the ground level:
>
> 1. Localization
>
> In an application, it is much nicer to be able to write
> "ground floor" (en-GB), "first floor" or "basement floor 2"
> than "level 0", "level M" or, worst, "level -1"

For any sufficiently complicated building, localization might be
better covered by putting the local level name in "building
nomeclature" in addr:floor as mentioned by Eugene.

To give an example, my local big shopping centre (400 m long, on
slightly sloping ground) names its "ground level" (with entrances from
street) "Level 2" or "Level 3" depending on where you are, the level
below "Level 2" is "Level 1", and the level below that is named "Urban
Eatery". In your scheme this would be levels=UE,1,2,3,4 and
ground_level=2 (I guess), which is fine for ref and determining
vertical orientation. But reconstructing a recognizable name from this
is hard. One could also make the argument that "Level 1" is the main
level of this centre: more people arrive at this level because that's
where the entrances from rapid transit stations are.

Another centre I'm familiar with (again on sloping ground) names its
levels in ascending order: "Ground Level", "Lower Level", "Upper
Level", with official refs M0, M1, M2 respectively, and depending on
definition all of them have street entrances.

--Jarek



More information about the Tagging mailing list