[Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node

Hubert87 sg.forum at gmx.de
Sat Jan 26 15:39:45 UTC 2019


Hi yopaseopor,

I think that
     highway=crossing
     crossing=uncontrolled
is also the excepted way of tagging for cycleways crossings.
You could add
     bicycle=yes
to that (crossing) Node to mark that this is bicycle crossing (,too).

Hubert87

Am 26.01.2019 um 15:17 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
>
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 12:05, yo paseopor <yopaseopor at gmail.com 
> <mailto:yopaseopor at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi!
>
>     Now I'm tagging with the more detail I can some cycleways in
>     Catalonia. I do al the ways, and I cut and mark all the crossings.
>     I do this with the formula
>     highway=cycleway
>     cycleway=crossing
>     as a way (like I do other times with
>     highway=footway
>     footway=crossing
>     for mark all the pedestrian crossing. But I have a dilemma. When I
>     want to tag the exact point in the cycleway crossing with the road
>     I would use highway=crossing
>     crossing=uncontrolled
>     ...but it is not so detailed enough so I think about a
>     crossing=cycleway
>
> The fact that the road is crossed by is crossed by a cycleway is 
> already defined by the "highway" tags' values of the two crossing 
> highways.
> The values of the "crossing" tag describe properties of the crossing 
> itself, not of the crossing ways.
>
>     highway=crossing
>     crossing=cycleway
>     would be a good formula.
>     What do you think?
>
> I think it is not in line with existing tagging
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190126/e2011e71/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list