[Tagging] crossing=cycleway as a node
Hubert87
sg.forum at gmx.de
Sat Jan 26 15:39:45 UTC 2019
Hi yopaseopor,
I think that
highway=crossing
crossing=uncontrolled
is also the excepted way of tagging for cycleways crossings.
You could add
bicycle=yes
to that (crossing) Node to mark that this is bicycle crossing (,too).
Hubert87
Am 26.01.2019 um 15:17 schrieb Volker Schmidt:
>
>
> On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 at 12:05, yo paseopor <yopaseopor at gmail.com
> <mailto:yopaseopor at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Now I'm tagging with the more detail I can some cycleways in
> Catalonia. I do al the ways, and I cut and mark all the crossings.
> I do this with the formula
> highway=cycleway
> cycleway=crossing
> as a way (like I do other times with
> highway=footway
> footway=crossing
> for mark all the pedestrian crossing. But I have a dilemma. When I
> want to tag the exact point in the cycleway crossing with the road
> I would use highway=crossing
> crossing=uncontrolled
> ...but it is not so detailed enough so I think about a
> crossing=cycleway
>
> The fact that the road is crossed by is crossed by a cycleway is
> already defined by the "highway" tags' values of the two crossing
> highways.
> The values of the "crossing" tag describe properties of the crossing
> itself, not of the crossing ways.
>
> highway=crossing
> crossing=cycleway
> would be a good formula.
> What do you think?
>
> I think it is not in line with existing tagging
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190126/e2011e71/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list