[Tagging] Use bbq=yes/no or barbecue_grill=yes/no with campsites?

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Fri Jul 5 14:56:30 UTC 2019


I don't think it would be necessary to combine "bbq=no" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes" - if a feature such as a leisure=picnic_site is
tagged "bring_own_bbq=yes" that is sufficient. The tag "bbq=no", like
most tags with value "no", can be omitted.

There might be times when there is "bbq=yes" and "bring_own_bbq=no",
if you have to use the provided grill and can't bring your own, and
certainly a feature could be tagged with both "bbq=yes" and
"bring_own_bbq=yes".

That said, I'm happy to use the tag "barbecue_grill=yes/no" if there
are other people who clearly prefer this tag to "bbq=yes/no"

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Campsite_properties
for the draft proposal

On 7/5/19, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Le 03.07.19 à 17:17, Jmapb via Tagging a écrit :
>> bbq:grills=yes/no/1+
>
> or device=* (already approved tag do describe the number
> of same devices) ?
>
>> bbq:bring_own=yes/no
>
> or equiped=yes/no : the bbq is always there or it's an allowed
> but not-equiped area and you need to bring your own ?
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>



More information about the Tagging mailing list