[Tagging] lit=yes/no threshold

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Jul 6 14:43:21 UTC 2019




6 Jul 2019, 14:07 by osm at westnordost.de:

>> I am trying to make lit=yes/no definition more precise
>>
>
> I think that your suggestions would make the definition actually less precise because they add a fair level of subjectiveness: "necessary to bring your own light"
>
> The least subjective definition is to map the physical presence of street lanterns on the way, not the light they emit. (This definition (though) would mean that a footway close to a lit street would be mapped as unlit as long as it does not have own lanterns.)
>
This may be less subjective but would be quite pointless - there are many, many cases (at least in my city) 
where many footways are well lit without dedicated lanterns.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190706/b7957940/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list