[Tagging] track smoothness/quality

[brad]

Here's one,
https://www.dropbox.com/s/agj4njek1r35vnz/2018-10-03-13.06.54r.jpg?dl=0
Maybe gets some maintenance every 10 or 20 years or so.  It is probably 
never soft, so it doesn't fit any tracktype definition. It is still used 
for a couple of  mines (worked by 1 or 2 people), but mostly 
recreational use.   This is higher altitude than most, but not unusual 
in the western US.

I think tracktype as specified is only useful for a small portion of the 
world.  Useful for flat, wet regions.


On 7/2/19 11:02 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> ...
>
>     2) Take the leading sentence mentioning Solid/Soft out of the
>     tracktype description (or de-emphasize it)
>
> I am dubious about redefining extremely
> popular tags. For start - can you link
> some photos of places where current
> definition is a problem?
>
> The best would be photos on licenses
> allowing upload to OSM Wiki or
> Wikimedia Commons.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190706/e3ee40a5/attachment.html>