[Tagging] Removing an ATM

[MARLIN LUKE]

Thanks everyone for the input.

I've noted that "removed:" could be interesting in specific cases, however considering where this one is (and it's removal date!), I deleted it.
________________________________
De : Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
Envoyé : mardi 9 juillet 2019 17:23
Cc : Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Objet : Re: [Tagging] Removing an ATM




9 lip 2019, 16:27 od pla16021 at gmail.com:
Not really.  They don't get rendered (on standard carto).  So they don't help anyone orient
themselves.
OSM Carto is not a sole map style.
As with disused: and abandoned:, the only real purpose is to prevent mappers re-instating the
object based upon out-of-date information.
Not only - some data consumers
may want to include objects present
but unused.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190709/55d95da6/attachment.html>