[Tagging] leisure=garden for private front/back gardens

[Florian Lohoff]

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:23:01AM +0200, Pee Wee wrote:
> Hi all

> I would like your opinion on the next issue.

> meaning on may 3, 2010 when someone added a description of “Garden” from
> the Wikipedia garden description that refers to private gardens. In order
> to differentiate from the publicly accessible gardens (with or without fee)
> sometime additional tags like “access=private”  and
> “garden:type=residential” are added. To me this seems better then no
> additional tags at all but in fact I think private gardens (not accessible)
> should not be tagged with the leisure key. On the talk page I saw that
> there are more objections

For me a leisure=* in OSM has some public usability assumption. Mapping
every little green strip as a leisure=garden i would consider a tagging
abuse.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
        UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190712/34fe388d/attachment.sig>