[Tagging] Tagging of State Parks in the US

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Jul 30, 2019, 9:54 AM by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> Am Di., 30. Juli 2019 um 00:51 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg <> joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com <mailto:joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>> >:
>
>> -1 to a site relation for an area with a defined outer boundary.
>>
>
>
>>
>> Relation = boundary (and =multipolygon) works fine for defining an area, and you can make holes to exclude at my “outparcels” or villages which are not part of the official protected area.
>>
>
>
>
> the difference is that in case a thing which is either outer or inner member of a boundary or multipolygon changes, you will not know whether the MP has to change or you have to duplicate the old border for the multipolygon because it should remain. In a site relation it is clearer that the modification of a member should likely have immediate effect on the relation as well.
>
Can you give more specific exampleof edit where site relation is better?

Things that are areas should be taggedas areas. So multipolygon seems
preferable to me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190730/541a992b/attachment.html>