[Tagging] lanes = 0

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Jun 15 11:14:20 UTC 2019


14 Jun 2019, 13:04 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:
> 1. Allroads did not favour nolanes=yes because it is a double negative
>
I agree, this is a bit overcomplicated.
> 2. lanes=no is not so good because there are people who estimate the lanes value if no markings are present (see ael's message). Adding "no" as a possible value that is to be applied when no visual markings are present would make a portion of the currently tagged lanes-tags wrong and thus would be a redefinition of the lanes key.
>
Blocking lane tagging is a poor idea
> 3. lane_marking=no has of the proposed tags the least semantic similarity to the lanes tag but on the other hand is used a few times already and is safe for the "_" instead of the ":" what Warin suggested
>
Seems ok to me
> 4. lanes:mark...=no would maybe imply that lanes=X must be tagged as well?
>
I see no obligation that tagging this
would mean that tagging lanes tag is
obligatory.

Also seems ok to me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190615/a3f4f1af/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list