[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sat Mar 2 08:49:50 UTC 2019




Mar 2, 2019, 2:05 AM by smz at smz.it:

> On 2019-03-02 01:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>  
>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 1. Mar 2019, at 13:45, Mateusz Konieczny >>> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>>>>  wrote:I would tag max weight, I would not tag emergency=no.
>>>
>> +1, it will not exclude all kinds of emergency services anyway, only those in vehicles that are too heavy, for example there could be police on bicycles who could cycle on the bridge like pedestrians can walk on it.Cheers, Martin
>>
>
>
>
>
> I really-really-really like to know of a place where emergency      vehicles are > legally > not allowed to go...
>
>
> And if there isn't such a place, why do we need ""?
>
>
> And if we don't have such a need, why do we need "emergency=yes"?
>
>
> Because a given road is > accessible > to a emergency      vehicles?
>
>
Apparently people like to explicitly tag in some situations.

Though in all cases when I used it I should be using emergency=designated
(road was signed as firefighter access road or main ambulance access at the hospital).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190302/37b1a600/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list