[Tagging] landcover=trees bot edits
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed Mar 6 11:50:13 UTC 2019
For me there is a significant difference between
"mappers adopted using this tag, usage tripled in a year"
"single import is source of almost all new instances of this tag"
Second is not indicating that mappers are using this tag.
Mar 6, 2019, 12:29 PM by pelderson at gmail.com:
> If it's an import (not zutomated edit) and the import is ok then it's regular usage.
> Vr gr Peter Elderson
> Op wo 6 mrt. 2019 om 09:55 schreef Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> >:
>> Mar 5, 2019, 1:47 PM by >> pelderson at gmail.com <mailto:pelderson at gmail.com>>> :
>>> Landcover now has about 170 000 usage count.
>>> Still growing rapidly despite not yet being rendered on OSM Carto.
>>> I would say that is enough reason to start renderin landcover on OSM Carto and other renderings.
>> I run a quick check, nearly 100% of explosive growth in 2018
>> is result of import in a Paraguay.
>> It is great evidence that raw usage count is not a perfect metric.
>> From quick look there is nothing truly terrible with this import but so far there is no
>> evidence that usage of landcover tags by mappers is growing.
>>  >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-469844223 <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-469844223>
>>  >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-470009614 <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2548#issuecomment-470009614>
>> Tagging mailing list
>> >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging