61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed Mar 6 21:33:44 UTC 2019
On 06/03/19 18:52, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> On 3/6/19 6:00 AM, Warin wrote:
>> So .. what is the best way to map them?
> My proposal would be a straightforward main tags chain to describe the
> physical landmark features - and then all the extra sauce specialists
> might want, but in a way that won't complicate the basics. So...
> antenna=dish (or monopole/dipole/yagi/helical/phased_array ...)
A 'dish' is a reflector to the antenna .. the antenna might be a dipole,
a horn etc.
While it is common to call an antenna a dish, tagging it as
'antenna=dish' means you cannot add 'antenna=dipole'.
Rather than antenna=dish it would be better to have dish=yes.
However this may complicate adding it to man_made=telescope,
telescope:type=radio as dish=yes does not mention antenna?
> and then radio aficionados may add as much of
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/antenna:use as
> they want (so we would amend this proposal to make it a complement to
> the physical landmark features main tags).
Yes.. that is the intention of the proposal - it is a sub tag to
something else (that is an antenna).
It does presently say it is a 'property key' and that should imply that
it describes another key?
More information about the Tagging