[Tagging] Pets allowed

seirra blake sophietheopossum at yandex.com
Thu Mar 7 13:07:43 UTC 2019


while I can't see a problem with a tag for each pet, it may still make 
more sense to have a pets tag and just namespace species/related things 
under it similar to the access tag. use cases I can think of:

  * pets=no | no matter what, no pets
  * pets=yes | open to all or at least most pets other than specified
    examples such as...
  * pets:dogs=no | dogs that are pets are not allowed, a guide dog does
    not necessarily count as a pet or at least, I don't think of one as
    being a pet.
  * pets:cats=1 | only one cat allowed

this does still make it vague in the sense that if only one cat is 
allowed, is it per party or per person, but this probably could be made 
more specific with another tag namespaced under pets (my mind is blank, 
I haven't eaten yet. however this feels like the best approach to cover 
most situations). this may also be useful for things like 
water-bowls/treats for pets as mentioned elsewhere here; for example: my 
bank offers dog biscuits for dogs, the train station used to offer a 
water-bowl as well, but I haven't put much thought into seeing if it's 
there after the take over by LNER.

On 3/7/19 12:17 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 12:05, <phil at trigpoint.me.uk 
> <mailto:phil at trigpoint.me.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Pets is probably a bit vague, many hotels will accept pet dogs,
>     but are less likely  to accept cats and extremely unlikely to my
>     pet alligator (no I don't really own one).
>
>
> Some holiday cottages accept dogs but place a limit on the number 
> (only one; a maximum of two; etc.)
> Yes, some do accept cats, and there are many cat owners who would love 
> to be able to take their
> cat on holiday with them.  So it would be nice if we had something a 
> little more flexible than
> dog=yes/no.
>
>     Obviously dogs=no will only apply to pets, registered assistance
>     dogs are covered by the law of the country, in the UK a
>     hotel/pub/restaurant is not allowed to refuse assistance dogs. I
>     assume the same is true throughout the EU.
>
>
> I believe that, in the UK, NO business can refuse assistance dogs (but 
> I could be wrong).  It's also
> the case in the UK that non-assistance dogs are NOT legally prohibited 
> from pubs and
> restaurants but only from food preparation areas: it's the owner's 
> decision as to whether or not
> dogs are allowed where food is served and sold.  See
> https://www.thekennelclub.org.uk/our-resources/kennel-club-campaigns/be-dog-friendly/
>
> Many shops and a few restaurants in my town display a sign somewhere 
> saying that dogs
> are allowed.
>
> -- 
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190307/08f821cb/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list