[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Line attachments

[Sergio Manzi]

On 2019-03-08 02:08, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 19:39, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Let the mappers vote on if it should be in OSM by using or not using it.
>> Here we should be getting the best tags
> +1, I would rather have a well-specified tag that is rarely used than
> no tag at all.
>
> --Jarek

Then why not bolts and nuts? I suppose there are many nuts of historical significance around.

Have a look at this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nut_(hardware)#/media/File:SydneyHarbourBridgeNutMilsonsPoint.JPG

Do you have something against nuts? I don't...

Sergio

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190308/2e7bec0e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190308/2e7bec0e/attachment.bin>