[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Line attachments

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Mar 8 04:15:53 UTC 2019


On 08/03/19 12:16, Sergio Manzi wrote:
> On 2019-03-08 02:08, Jarek PiĆ³rkowski wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 19:39, Warin<61sundowner at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Let the mappers vote on if it should be in OSM by using or not using it.
>>> Here we should be getting the best tags
>> +1, I would rather have a well-specified tag that is rarely used than
>> no tag at all.
>>
>> --Jarek
>
> Then why not bolts and nuts? I suppose there are many nuts of 
> historical significance around.
>

Open Historical Map for historical stuff...

> Have a look at this: 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nut_(hardware)#/media/File:SydneyHarbourBridgeNutMilsonsPoint.JPG
>
> Do you have something against nuts? I don't...
>

I do if they come up done when they should not, or they strip.

If you want to tag nuts and bolts .. then put up a proposal.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190308/fc1bb1c7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list