[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Line attachments
61sundowner at gmail.com
Fri Mar 8 04:15:53 UTC 2019
On 08/03/19 12:16, Sergio Manzi wrote:
> On 2019-03-08 02:08, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 19:39, Warin<61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Let the mappers vote on if it should be in OSM by using or not using it.
>>> Here we should be getting the best tags
>> +1, I would rather have a well-specified tag that is rarely used than
>> no tag at all.
> Then why not bolts and nuts? I suppose there are many nuts of
> historical significance around.
Open Historical Map for historical stuff...
> Have a look at this:
> Do you have something against nuts? I don't...
I do if they come up done when they should not, or they strip.
If you want to tag nuts and bolts .. then put up a proposal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging