[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - police=*

Jan S grimpeur78 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 9 22:10:03 UTC 2019



Am 9. März 2019 22:34:39 MEZ schrieb marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com>:
>
>police:name : it's not what should be in operator or network ?
>
>police:type : type is a no-meaning tag despite I currently no idea for
>a 
>good name.
>I also fail to understand the dif with police:name.
>what's the police:name of CRS ?
>what's the police:type of NYPD ?

Thanks for your observations. I'll collect more opinions on the abolition of amenity=police.

I've added some tagging examples to the proposal, so I hope that the concept is clearer now.

Best, Jan



More information about the Tagging mailing list