[Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw
okosm at johnfreed.com
Tue Mar 12 17:50:37 UTC 2019
direction=clockwise/anticlockwise makes sense for a node (like a
miniroundabout), not for a way
on a way, the common usage is "oneway=yes" and make sure the way (which is
by nature directional) is pointing the right direction.
It doesn't make much sense for a hiking route to use "clockwise" (why the
"cw" abbreviation???) or "anticlockwise" ("ccw" is presumably an
abbreviation for the American English word "counterclockwise"). Because
those terms only make sense if the route is a closed loop that doesn't
self-intersect, have branches, or anything complicated.
So "oneway=yes" solves all these cases quite simply. Avoid "oneway=-1" by
the way, just use "oneway=yes" and reverse the direction of the way if it's
My two cents (from extensive work on bus routes, not hiking routes).
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:32 AM s8evq <s8evq at runbox.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I have a question concerning the correct way to add the direction of
> travel to roundtrip route=hiking|foot|bicycle relations.
> I saw in the route=hiking wiki page that the usage of oneway=cw and
> oneway=ccw has been added in 2017, with the word "proposal: " in front.
> Since then, this tag has not been used that much:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/oneway=cw (4 times)
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/oneway=ccw (6 times)
> I see there is also the tag "direction=" with a lot more usage. On
> mini-roundabouts (as documented in the wiki
> but sometimes even on route=foot, route=hiking and route=bicycle (not
> documented in the wiki)
> Could somebody clear this up, for a novice user like me? How to correctly
> add the direction of travel to roundtrip route=hiking|foot|bicycle
> relations? What is the status or meaning of this "proposal: " wording? And
> what about using direction?
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging