[Tagging] mapping large memorial objects that roads pass through.
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Mar 14 00:16:03 UTC 2019
+ 1 on gate way - can be applied to many items.
A node for each pillar and a way to connect them?
Each pillar with man_made=pillar??
and the way with man_made=gateway???
Then sub tags for gateway=*.
On 13/03/19 21:32, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> A Torii is not exactly an arch, but it is a gateway (at least
> symbolically). Perhaps man_made=gateway is a more general term, which
> can incude archways as well as rectangular gateways
>
> If you would like, you can start a proposal page.
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 7:26 PM Tony Shield <tony.shield999 at gmail.com
> <mailto:tony.shield999 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Been wondering for months how to tag arches in general - not a
> mention
> in Wiki.
>
> I do like man-made = arch.
>
> I do think that there are several major types of arch which help, so
> this discussion started with torii and a possible answer is given as
>
> Perhaps they could be man_made=archway and archway=torii?
>
> The archway tag could have values such as torii, triumphal-arch
> (Arc de
> Triomphe in Paris, Marble Arch in London), roman-gate. Suitable
> values
> for others will be needed.
>
> It seems to me that many arches have a deep cultural significance,
> often
> they were constructed to be significant in that respect, so I would
> expect memorial or possibly religious tags to be associated with
> an arch.
>
> How to proceed? If there is agreement does it need voting on? Or
> can the
> wiki be expanded to show this as a tag?
>
> Regards
>
> TonyS
>
> On 13/03/2019 08:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> > sent from a phone
> >
> >> On 13. Mar 2019, at 01:35, Joseph Eisenberg
> <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com <mailto:joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> We considered man_made=gantry (which in general can be used
> >> for any sort of structure than goes over a road) or
> man_made=archway.
> >
> > +1, there is also man_made=arch (32 uses vs 7 for archway)
> >
> >
> >> There was also a suggestion to tag some of these structures as
> a type
> >> of artwork, although this is only sometimes relevant.
> >
> > +1, add additionally artwork if you consider the thing a work of
> art.
> >
> >
> > The section of road itself passing under the arch could be
> tagged with covered=yes, this is a hint for the renderer
> >
> >
> > Cheers, Martin
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190314/9f0cfd22/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list