[Tagging] Do we still need cycleway=opposite_lane? (Was: Do we still need cycleway=opposite?)

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Mar 19 08:30:19 UTC 2019




Mar 19, 2019, 8:29 AM by selfishseahorse at gmail.com:

> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 00:30, Warin <> 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On 19/03/19 10:03, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 07:47, Markus <>>> selfishseahorse at gmail.com <mailto:selfishseahorse at gmail.com>>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately, many tags are used wrongly (e.g. name, access tags,
>>>> grass, water park) – do you want to replace all of them?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes!!! :-)
>>>
>>
>> All those used incorrectly should be corrected. If that means deletion .. so be it. But those used correctly should be left.
>>
>
> So why not correcting those 850 (6%) incorrect uses of
> cycleway*=opposite_lane instead of inventing a new tagging system for
> it? I've already corrected a few dozen, here's the link if you want to
> help me:
>
> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/H91 <http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/H91>
>
I worry about data damage in remote editing so I will not join.

But I would like JOSM validator to notice such inconsistencies during my edits so I opened 
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/17488#ticket

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190319/a03a55e2/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list