[Tagging] Intermittently unprotected cycle track

[Richard Fairhurst]

Thanks everyone for the comments!

althio wrote:
> My preference would be to keep the geometry, map it as a continuous
> highway=cycleway.
> For the bits without divider, I don't like protected=no however.
> I would go with no additional tagging, and more geometry (as you said:
> crossings and junctions), and let the geometry speaks.

On balance I agree and I'll go for this solution.

Please send out a search party if I haven't returned in three days from the
maze of nested relations that is cycle routes in East London.

cheers
Richard



--
Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html