[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Runway Holding Positions

Steven Estes tapestes at gmail.com
Fri Mar 29 20:22:05 UTC 2019

Yup.  Typo on my part.  Digging some more, I have a better understanding of
the tagging system.  It doesn't look like holding_position:type is seeing a
ton of use, and from what I can tell, it'd be more conventional and less
onerous to drop "type" and go with holding_position=.  I can document that
in the aeroway=holding_position tag page, with links back to that page from
holding_position=runway, =intermediate, & =ILS.  I'm planning on using the
same format as the How to Map section of waterway=dock

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:37 PM Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhauser at gmail.com>

> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:14 PM Steven Estes <tapestes at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, I was confused.  It looks the tag format would be
>> aeroway=holding_position:type=runway.
> I think you have a typo here, in practice this would be two separate
> key/value tags: aeroway=holding_position and holding_position:type=runway.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190329/43b72874/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list