[Tagging] Verifiability wiki page: "Geometry" section added

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed May 1 04:53:04 UTC 2019


On 29/04/19 15:21, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I would guess that they could be:
> Austinville -  place=hamlet
> Springbrook - place=village

+1 - both as nodes?

Springbrook would be centred on the pub or store ... or halfway between the two.

Austinville ... centred on the community hall.

> On 4/29/19, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 06:23, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I cannot imagine houses that are several kilometers away being part of a
>>> hamlet, in a settlement sense. Can you give an example please, maybe this
>>> can occur in very low density areas?
>>>
>> I mentioned these the other week in discussions about place=locality.
>>
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4313816641 is the area known as
>> Austinville, which is spread out over ~20 sq km along Austinville Rd &
>> surrounding area, & has a population of ~360. There is no "town centre" as
>> such - no shop, no service station, no pub, no church which are the usual
>> defining features. The only similar thing is the Community Hall. The area
>> is currently listed in OSM as place=locality, should it be a hamlet, either
>> as a node or an area?
>>
>> Springbrook
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4316622215#map=15/-28.2069/153.2700 has
>> a population of ~600 & is the plateau on top of Springbrook Mountain. It
>> has a general store, State (Primary) School, a pub & a few cafes, but, once
>> again, no real "centre". It's also a place=locality, so should it be a
>> hamlet?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Graeme
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging





More information about the Tagging mailing list