[Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

[Tobias Wrede]

Am 30.04.2019 um 21:05 schrieb Kevin Kenny:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:19 PM s8evq <s8evq at runbox.com> wrote:
>> Personally, I like signed_direction=yes. It's simple and avoids using the word oneway.
>> Also, using the value forward|backward might not be necessary, as it's possible to deduce this from the order of ways in the relation.
> The forward/backward direction cannot be deduced from the order of the
> ways if the relation contains fewer than three ways.
>
>
Do you suggest to stick with (counter)clockwise then?

Is there really a use case? How many circular routes are made up of only 
one or two ways? I suppose one could add the information to the ways 
then in that special case.

The counter(clockwise) designation doesn't work well in cases of 
touching or crossing ways (figure 8 shaped trails for example) or when 
alternative routes are included in the relation.

Tobias