[Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

[s8evq]

Reading the replies, it seems the open question is whether we should solely rely on the order of ways in a relation, or on a key value to deduce/specify the direction in which the signposts are visible. I'm open for either solution. 

My question is: If you we use "forward|backward|both" as the value in for example designated_direction=*", to what does forward relate? How do you know what forward is?

On Thu, 2 May 2019 11:35:38 +0200, Tobias Wrede <list at tobias-wrede.de> wrote:

> Am 30.04.2019 um 20:18 schrieb s8evq:
> > - bidirectional=no
> > - signed_oneway=yes
> > - signed_direction=yes
> > - designated_direction=forward|both|backward
> > - signed=forward|backward|both|none
> >
> > Personally, I like signed_direction=yes. It's simple and avoids using the word oneway.
> > Also, using the value forward|backward might not be necessary, as it's possible to deduce this from the order of ways in the relation.
> >
> signed_direction=yes is not intuitive in my opinion. Mappers might apply 
> it ("yes, there is a signed direction") but might forget to put the 
> members in the right order. Having a forward|backward|both|none in there 
> might make it more obvious to take care to apply the tag correctly.
> 
> Tobias
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging