[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC (etc) for crossing:signals

[marc marc]

Le 07.05.19 à 23:08, Nick Bolten a écrit :
> What do crossing=uncontrolled/unmarked/traffic_signals say about these scenarios?

> crossing=uncontrolled:

ground marking but not traffic signal

>    - signalization for pedestrians is undefined

sorry I didn't understand what you mean.
crossing describe the crossing.
if you want to describe a traffic sign, check traffic_sign key

>    - markings are implied

I didn't see where you see this "implied"

> crossing=unmarked:
>    - signalization for pedestrians is undefined

the color of the nearest building is not indicated either,
fortunately because it is not the role of this key.
if you want a traffic sign info, check traffic_sign key

>    - signalization for traffic is undefined

again...


> crossing=traffic_signals
>    - markings are undefined

again... (check crossing_ref)

> So, you can see the problem: the values are describing completely 
> different things and the rest is ambiguous.

the current situation is far from perfect, but either you have not 
understood the current tags, or you are blackening the current situation 
to promote your proposal to change everything, which seems unrealistic.