[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC (etc) for crossing:signals

[Warin]

On 08/05/19 19:18, marc marc wrote:
> Le 08.05.19 à 10:30, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
>> „uncontrolled“, as it is a misnomer.
> indeed, but what could be a better value ?
> crossing=not_controlled_by_a_traffic_signal is a little long

I have used 'uncontrolled' where there is no marking, no aids but a 'common' crossing place.

If a crossing has some 'aid' then the aid should be tagged.