[Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related questions

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Sun May 19 21:57:19 UTC 2019


On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 02:32, <osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:

Pretty well agree with everything you said, Thorsten, but I'd like to
clarify one point thanks.

no - there is no crossing possible/legal here
>

Understand the idea, but how do we actually use it?

The fence here
https://www.google.com/maps/@-28.0725198,153.4441123,3a,75y,182.92h,70.96t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1spYYE39O0IZ2ymA7Jh-D-5g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
is
"supposed" to stop people crossing the highway (it doesn't!) & extends for
several k, broken only by cross-streets, turning lanes & pedestrian
crossings.

So how do we mark crossing=no along this entire stretch?

Draw the fence in & add a crossing tag to that? Would anything / anyone
read it?

Crossing=no added to the road itself? Same thing applies.

Any other thoughts? (Or is there an obvious, simple solution that I'm
missing :-))

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190520/2f6a8f9d/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list