[Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related questions

[John Willis]

> On May 20, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Nick Bolten <nbolten at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately, people will draw the crossing if there isn't negative information there saying to stop doing that, e.g. crossing=no

if you are having trouble where people are “fixing” your mapping, then draw a way with no highway=* tag

put crossing=no on it. that should at least read as “mapped” to imagery tracers out there. 

similar to demolished=* on a line mapped over a bridge visible on imagery that has actually been destroyed. 

Javbw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190520/ebe7b1a7/attachment.html>