[Tagging] Navaid relation?

[Florian Lohoff]

Hola Mateusz,

On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> 21 May 2019, 23:46 by f at zz.de:
> 
> > - Houses which are routeable by road a but are near road b or vice
> >  versa.
> >
> > Adding more roads aka service/driveway does not necessary make it more
> > deterministic.
> >
> Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, footways
> and obstacles where well written router will fail?

- Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany
	It does not have a connection to Baumstraße but to
	Hermann-Vogelsang-Straße.

	It still will be routed through Baumstraße and the driveway to
	Baumstraße 45a

	IMHO unfixable without bending geometry 

- Dalbker Straße 40a, Oerlinghausen, Germany 
  Dalbker Straße 44a, Oerlinghausen, Germany 
	Both fixed by moving the Address to a node, moving it further to
	Dalkbker Straße within the outline of the Building.

	Otherwise you'd be routed to Buchweizenweg without access to
	the Building. This is what multiple of my collegues complained
        about.

	Here i bend geometry until it halfway worked.

Just 2 examples for the last 10 days or so. And footways wont help
you in a car profile. You could bring a footway directly connecting
the entrance to the Street.

Flo
-- 
Florian Lohoff                                                 f at zz.de
        UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190522/f3cfbfe8/attachment.sig>