[Tagging] ID is not a king and final arbiter of OSM (was: iD adding highway=footway to all railway/public_transport=platform ways and relations)

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu May 23 15:15:52 UTC 2019

Though repeated attempts by @bhousel and @quincylvania to declare themselves as 
final arbiters of OSM tagging and dismissing everybody else is certainly not helping. 

That is really not going to work, and it is a pity because plenty of work done of him is really great
but it is tainted by ignoring arguments of critics. No one is right all the time.

To directly quote part of
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6409#issuecomment-495231649 <https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6409#issuecomment-495231649>

"Some things that don't really factor at all into our decision:

    how long a tag with implicit semantics has been in use
    how many softwares (renderers / routers or whatever) already support the implicit rule
    how frequently the tag is used
    what a handful of people on a mostly dormant mailing list think
    what one person has written on the osm wiki
    how many downvotes you encourage people to put on our issue list
    what they are saying about us in the weekly osm tabloid"
So someone is dismissing what everybody else thinks and at the same time expects everybody
to accept his own opinions?

Some ideas from tagging mailing list and OSM wiki (even after limiting to popular ones
or "approved") are pointless/harmful but that is not a valid reason to simply ignore all of them.

23 May 2019, 10:16 by osm at westnordost.de:

> I like your wording. It is a burden. He also takes all the complaints for bugs and when iD steps on someone's shoes. This is a very stressful position to be in.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190523/901350d9/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list