[Tagging] Tagging buildings that people work in
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri May 24 07:28:06 UTC 2019
24 May 2019, 02:24 by kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:07 PM marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> following that, building=yes building:use=yes is better
>> yes can be improved when you'll known that's the current use,
>> if it not the same as what is excepted for this building look
>>
>
> I'm even fine with 'building=yes note=*'. A data consumer isn't likely
> to be able to do much with any invented tagging for the partial
> information - a note is about as good as any kind of structured data
> here.
>
And may be even better as some tools that detect building=yes and help in
filling more detailed data would not process this new building value
(for example StreetComplete)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190524/b1a4bca6/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list