[Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

[Mateusz Konieczny]

24 May 2019, 22:16 by pla16021 at gmail.com:

> On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 21:09, <> osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au>> > wrote:
>
>>
>> crossing=traffic_signals – there are explicit traffic signals that tell pedestrians when to stop. There are very likely road markings, but even if not, the absence of road markings, in the presence of actual traffic signals, is irrelevant for how this crossing operates.
>>
>>
>
> Yep.
>
> That was how I interpreted it all until the Polish contingent threw a spanner in the works.  I'm
> waiting for a response to see if it's a big spanner or a little spanner.
>
AFAIK once traffic lights are present markings are not changing anything (and crossing
with traffic lights without markings are really rare, I suspect that almost always result of worn-out
painting or recent surface reconstruction).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190524/1f11d7a8/attachment-0001.html>