[Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

[Paul Allen]

On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 01:10, <osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:

>
> And none of that matters for the broad classification that the crossing=*
> key does,
>

+1


> which is:
>


> The labels chosen for these 4 categories are : no, unmarked, uncontrolled,
> traffic_signals. But they may as well have been a, b, c, d. Don’t try to
> interpret anything more into the label.
>

e: controlled (crossing guard/lollipop person).


>
> These are the 4 different mutually exclusive types of crossings that need
> to be distinguished.
>

+1 for "mutually exclusive."  Except, perhaps, in Poland.  I'm still
waiting for an answer on that one.

We may need clearer documentation, particularly country-specific
documentation.  Maybe also
editor presets with country-specific intelligence.

-- 
Paul
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190525/83f5c370/attachment.html>