[Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

Simon Poole simon at poole.ch
Sat May 25 12:02:17 UTC 2019


Am 25.05.2019 um 12:48 schrieb osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au:
>
> Yes, but that’s not the point.
>
>  
>
> The presence or absence of markings do not change the fundamental
> operating principle of the crossing (go only when it’s green).
>
>  
>
> The strips shown in the image you linked do not mean that pedestrians
> have priority here and can just walk across any time, no matter what
> the signal says.
>
>  
>
> The crossing would work exactly the same with and without these strips.
>
Not if the lights are not running/blinking (as is the case with the
specific example outside of rushhours iirc) then the legal semantics are
the same as if there are no lights.

>  
>
>  
>
> *From:*Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch>
> *Sent:* Saturday, 25 May 2019 20:25
> *To:* tagging at openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals:
> crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no
>
>  
>
>  
>
> Am 25.05.2019 um 02:18 schrieb Paul Allen:
>
>      
>
>     +1 for "mutually exclusive."  Except, perhaps, in Poland.  I'm
>     still waiting for an answer on that one.
>
>      
>
>      
>
> Traffic signal controlled crossings with markings (including stripes
> of some colour) exist (not claiming that they are "common") at least
> all over central Europe (as pointed out in one of the contributions a
> couple of 100 postings back, they will typically control the vehicle
> traffic too). Random example
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/sp8962de?menu=false&focus=photo&lat=47.4040085&lng=8.39442809000002&z=15.17281376123384&signs=true&pKey=zL2pXJc6T_RffQheFsdbYA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190525/dfb368cc/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190525/dfb368cc/attachment.sig>


More information about the Tagging mailing list