[Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

[Mateusz Konieczny]

24 May 2019, 22:25 by osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au:

>> Does any of this change in a jurisdiction where there is an implied
>> crossing at every intersection unless posted otherwise?
>>
>
> Such purely implied crossings would be crossing=unmarked, and under the "do not map local legislation" rule, I would only map them if they have a physical presence (e.g. lowered kerbs).
>
Or where sidewalks are mapped separately from road as highway=footway
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190525/fb49ecc6/attachment.html>