[Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

[Nick Bolten]

> The zebra markings at traffic lights might be a fallback for when the
lights are turned off or not operating regularly (e.g. blinking yellow
light)

This is a good point and could potentially be relevant for disaster
response / evacuation procedures.

On Sat, May 25, 2019, 3:39 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 24. May 2019, at 23:35, Nick Bolten <nbolten at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > crossing=traffic_signals – there are explicit traffic signals that tell
> pedestrians when to stop. There are very likely road markings, but even if
> not, the absence of road markings, in the presence of actual traffic
> signals, is irrelevant for how this crossing operates.
>
> I think the other definitions match up with the wiki (though they are more
> specific here than there).
>
> What does it mean for a crossing to operate and why would ground markings
> be irrelevant?
>
>
>
> The zebra markings at traffic lights might be a fallback for when the
> lights are turned off or not operating regularly (e.g. blinking yellow
> light)
>
>
> Cheers, Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190526/00438947/attachment.html>