[Tagging] Feature proposal - RFC - Connectivity

[marc marc]

Hello,

in the rational, you said "there are many cases where turn:lanes=*
can't provide that information."
could you add a case where turn:lanes are included that more
clearly shows what the connectivity=* adds ?
ideally 2 examples that would have the same turn:lanes value for the 
"from" way and the same number of lanes on the "to" way but not the
same connectivity=* value

Regards,
Marc

Le 27.05.19 à 18:43, Leif Rasmussen a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
> I emailed this list a month ago about my proposal (Connectivity 
> relations), and received a lot of feedback.  I have also contacted many 
> other sources for feedback.  I used all of the feedback to make the 
> proposal much more comprehensive and able to store much richer data 
> about lanes in OpenStreetMap.
> Some new features:
> * The possibility of stating whether connectivity is "default", aka 
> "lane you will end up in if you don't change lanes, take an exit, turn, 
> or leave an ending lane"
> * Conditional connectivity
> * Much more clear examples on the page
> * Support in iD for not breaking connectivity relations and other 
> from-via-to relations that don't have type=restriction.
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Connectivity
> 
> Please provide any final feedback for this proposal either here on this 
> mailing list or on the talk page for the proposal.  I will likely open 
> up voting for this proposal in a week or so if I don't see any issues 
> with the proposal.
> 
> Thanks,
> Leif Rasmussen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>