[Tagging] Irrigation: ditches, canals and drains
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri May 31 14:09:41 UTC 2019
31 May 2019, 12:26 by pla16021 at gmail.com:
> Example of the horrors of using canal for a leat with current carto:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609805692#map=16/52.0804/-4.6799 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609805692#map=16/52.0804/-4.6799>
> At z=19 it's actually close to the true width of the leat.
>
is usage=headrace sufficient to describe it as a leat? IMHO not
Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage=headrace <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:usage=headrace>
it seems that usage=headrace has no uniform size size -
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Canal_EDF_Oraison_5.jpg <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Canal_EDF_Oraison_5.jpg>
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:SBB_Historic_-_F_103_00003_01_015_-_Zulaufstollen_Kraftwerk_Amsteg,_Auskleidung_der_Kreisprofilstrecke_small.jpg <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:SBB_Historic_-_F_103_00003_01_015_-_Zulaufstollen_Kraftwerk_Amsteg,_Auskleidung_der_Kreisprofilstrecke_small.jpg>
are both among examples, with drastic size differences.
I think that in this case, with only
usage=headrace
waterway=canal
tags even a perfect renderer would have a trouble.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190531/0cea9ee1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list