[Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?
61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed Nov 6 00:24:05 UTC 2019
On 06/11/19 09:44, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 07:23, Martin Koppenhoefer
> <dieterdreist at gmail.com <mailto:dieterdreist at gmail.com>> wrote:
> sent from a phone
> > On 5. Nov 2019, at 18:48, Markus <selfishseahorse at gmail.com
> <mailto:selfishseahorse at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > I guess that bicycle=no almost always means that *driving* a bicycle
> > isn't allowed. So it seems just logical to use a new tag for places
> > where pushing (or transporting) bicycles isn't allowed too. Maybe
> > bicycle=total_ban or bicycle_pushed=no?
> I agree that bicycle=no has no implications for people pushing bikes,
> But if bicycle=no means that you can't ride a bike, wouldn't foot=no
> also mean that you can't push a bike ie if you're pushing a bike,
> you're walking, & foot=no means you can't walk, so you can't be
> pushing a bike?
If walking is allowed but bicycles (ridden, carried or pushed) are not
allowed .. then????
Logically bicycle=no should be taken as no bicycles (ridden, pushed,
carried or any other way).
Does motor_vehicle=no mean I can push one though there? I did think not
... at least not on a regular basis ...
However the sign of a bicycle with a red slash through it is usually
taken as no ridding of a bicycle and normally allows dismounted
transportation of bicycles. At least that is my and others use of the
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging