[Tagging] Walking & Cycling Node Network tagging: undoing the hijacking of rcn and rwn

[Andy Townsend]

On 29/08/2019 15:52, Peter Elderson wrote:
> LS
> With the arrival of cycling node networks, the Dutch, German and 
> Belgian mappers decided to claim (hijack)  the network value rcn for 
> those node networks. This exception was copied with the claim of 
> network=rwn for the walking node networks.

Would it be possible to try and describe in a bit more detail what has 
happened, without using judgmental terms such as "hijack"?  I'd start 
with a link helping people understand what a "cycling node network" is.

Can you give an example of a "normal" rcn and a "node network" that 
someone has tagged as an rcn and explain what the problem is with this 
tagging?

Best Regards,

Andy