[Tagging] Walking & Cycling Node Network tagging: undoing the hijacking of rcn and rwn
Andy Townsend
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Sun Sep 1 10:33:36 UTC 2019
On 29/08/2019 15:52, Peter Elderson wrote:
> LS
> With the arrival of cycling node networks, the Dutch, German and
> Belgian mappers decided to claim (hijack) the network value rcn for
> those node networks. This exception was copied with the claim of
> network=rwn for the walking node networks.
Would it be possible to try and describe in a bit more detail what has
happened, without using judgmental terms such as "hijack"? I'd start
with a link helping people understand what a "cycling node network" is.
Can you give an example of a "normal" rcn and a "node network" that
someone has tagged as an rcn and explain what the problem is with this
tagging?
Best Regards,
Andy
More information about the Tagging
mailing list